The 17 day diet has risks

The 17 day diet has risks. The people who take statins over period of only two or three years will develop type two diabetes, because of the statin. And I think that’s crucial because then you start look- ing into, “Okay, well what are the benefits?” And when you look at the data, in- dependently analyzed, if you are at low risk of heart disease, as in you have a less in 20% risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the next ten years, there is no more mortality benefit. You are not going to live one day longer. At the 10% level, we know that you have to treat 140 people for one person to prevent a non- fatal heart attack or stroke. So then we are now saying, well you are more likely to get type two diabetes and that’s even before we get into the whole issue about side effects that interfere with the quality of life. Learn more at http://buzzwiser.net/tag/relate and Which we know, you know, vary from depending on various reports. Vary from at least what we would say, 10 to 20%. And you know, that really changes the whole perception about the use of these drugs and the benefits patients are getting. And then to add more fuel to the fire Mark, how many patients were actually told that in the conversation when they’re having discussions about taking statins. Every single patient thinks, they are going to benefit and therefore in my view, we have an epidemic of misinformation around fat, around sugar, around statins. Dr. Hyman: Yeah, absolutely. So let’s take it down a little bit. So with the fat and the metabolic syndrome, because that’s really the key. What you’re basically saying, is that when you are a cardiologist, I mean, you look at the data. Most of the people coming with heart attacks have pre-diabetes or type-two diabetes, like that’s the driver of heart disease for most people. Aseem: No, absolutely. Dr. Hyman : It’s not necessarily, LDL cholesterol. Check out http://sundowndivers.org/?p=70 to learn more about the 17 day diet. No, absolutely. And I think, we had a publication recently in the Post Graduate Medical Journal, it was a very good a paper in one of the diabetes journals a few years ago and they actually gave a hierarchy in terms of what are the most important risk factors behind heart attacks. And actually insulin resistance comes up number one, followed by hypertension, high blood pressure, and then BMI and actually LDL cholesterol comes lower down. So even then, if you take the published data at face value and you know, there is certainly, there is some question marks around publication bias, as you know, even best case scenario, LDL is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in my view. At best is really a much weaker risk factor than people believe it is. Dr. Hyman: Yeah, I mean, and this is going to be as strong for example as the total cholesterol to the HDL ratio, right? No, absolutely. And that in fact, when people do that cardiovascular risk assessment when you plug in all the different variables from your body mass index, your family history to your blood pressure to your sex to whether you have had a history of angina?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>